Energy Management

State Grid Corporation later acquired XJ Group, the high level group, I do not agree with, I did not sign, I did the work, I said, why should you do it this way? And the original Power Reform Changwangfenkai main auxiliary separate contrary. If the high level group and XJ Group acquired other enterprises in the future think you are unfair, it is your own son, the other is the godson, even if you do it again fair, people will say you have pro sparse. But they see I is not granted, awarded by way of other ministries.

More recently, a controversial the UHV transmission problems. Earliest in the central file the UHV word, not the National Energy Board, nor the Development and Reform Commission, not the State Grid Corporation, but the Ministry of Science and Technology led the development of long-term planning of the national science and technology. In addition, there are two document issued by the State Council mentioned in UHV. In my opinion, now go argumentation should or should not engage in UHV have been putting the cart before the horse. If these files, there are different views, and that is questioning the State Department documents is there a credibility problem. In fact, to dwell on this issue, do not make sense. With the emergence of the grid, the voltage level gradually increase, I'm not saying that can go on infinitely, you today 1000 kV, 2000 kV, not mean that tomorrow can be mentioned, that technically is entirely possible that some changes.

I think that the power system reform should still maintain a gradual process. Such as transmission and distribution separation, it is necessary to the progress of society as a whole, the ability of the community can afford to match, also match other reforms, for example, the reform of the price system, the price system is not in place, how to separate transmission and distribution? And the price is normalized prices departmental management, the National Energy Board tube. Someone asked me, allocated to the National Energy Board okay? In my view that does not work under the current external conditions. Each department to speak for his own department, the National Energy Board to manage the price is likely to be biased in favor of energy companies think prices speak on behalf of energy companies.

Also suggested that community should develop energy law, the energy management system legal basis. State Energy Office issued an exposure draft in 2007, but has so far not be pushed down. As it relates to all aspects. For example, modifying the Electricity Law and the Coal Law, the two law enacted more than 20 years ago, but the old Electricity Law also many reference is correct, can continue to be retained. This is very important. Now what Difficulties? Departments they want some of the powers of his own department, some of the demands placed on law, trying to the Sanding program which does not solve the problem by the law to solve. We can not use the law to to solve the Sanding program does not solve the problem, SERC with the Energy Bureau of the relationship did not pull clear by the Electricity Law to pull clear? This increases the difficulty to modify or legislation.